CP on Facebook


CP on Twitter
Print Email

The Mail

Tweedle Doh!

The number of signatures required to get on the ballot is obstructive, not democratic.

Regarding City Paper’s new year’s resolutions piece on open primary elections (“Hold open primaries for all elections,” Feature, Jan. 1), the stats, rationale, and sentiments almost look good. It is easy to find oneself concurring with the idea of opening up the Democratic Party primaries to all who choose to vote therein, regardless of party affiliation, in the name of “democracy.”

The problem I have with the concept is that the primary election is meant to serve as the mechanism whereby members of a political party choose who among their party’s candidates will represent their party in the general election. If so, then why does it make sense to allow members of some other party to have a say in a different party’s candidate selection process?

If I were, for example, a Republican (I was in my youth, before I figured out who was lying in the Vietnam War—they all were!), I wouldn’t want a Democrat having a say in choosing who would be the GOP candidate in the gubernatorial elections. Likewise, if I were a Green: I wouldn’t want Republicans determining who would or would not be the Green Party candidate for U.S. senator.

Rather than determining that Baltimore or Maryland primaries should be open to any properly registered voter of any or no party, voting in any party primary they want, the best way to democratize the electoral process would be to ease up on the primary and general election process to any bona fide party that registers, whether it be Democratic, Republican, Socialist, Green, Communist, Working Families, or any other party. The number of signatures required to get on the ballot is obstructive, not democratic.

If the writer of this resolution is concerned about meaningful change toward a “healthy democracy,” then I suggest looking toward reform that makes it possible for us to vote for people in parties beyond “tweedledee and tweedledum.”

Jim Baldridge


  • Tough Sell Few real-estate developers have the capacity or the perseverance to take on such a difficult undertaking as developing, or redeveloping, affordable housing. | 4/16/2014
  • Faith Shaken, Not Stirred What would the future hold for Charm City’s beloved alternative weekly? | 4/9/2014
  • For the Birds I’ll know CP is toast when you all run a cover with the headline “That Sure Was A Lotta Snow.” | 4/2/2014
  • Adjunct Poverty I came to consider my two classes as volunteer work to justify working so hard for so little. | 3/26/2014
  • Video Daze If my friend told me she was dating someone, I would ask if she put his name on her Video Americain card as a way of knowing how serious they were. | 3/19/2014
We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus