Trending
MOST READ
“It used to be a skill, now it’s a pill”

“It used to be a skill, now it’s a pill”

Feature: A male porn star from Dundalk talks about sex, politics, and rock ’n’ roll By Baynard Woods 2/13/2013
Real-Life Embarassing Sex Stories

Real-Life Embarassing Sex Stories

Feature: Submitted by City Paper readers 2/13/2013
Sociable Satanist

Sociable Satanist

City Folk: Occult investigator “Dr. Daniel Rumanos” doesn’t need a day job By Van Smith 8/8/2012

Murder Ink

Murder Ink: Murders in 2011: 196; Murders this Week: 1; Murders this Year: 0 By Anna Ditkoff 1/4/2012
Murder Ink

Murder Ink

Murder Ink: Murders this Week: 2; Murders this Year: 79 By Edward Ericson Jr. 5/22/2013

Film Fest Frenzy

Feature: Our guide to the 2012 Maryland Film Festival 5/8/2013
Lost City Diner Found!

Lost City Diner Found!

Eats and Drinks: Station North’s Area 51-esque eatery makes a comeback By Jenn Ladd 4/10/2013
Murder Ink

Murder Ink

Murder Ink: Murders this Week: 6; Murders this Year: 46 By Edward Ericson Jr. 3/27/2013
Calendar
 

Baltimore Daily Deals powered by ReferLocal
Print Email

Mobtown Beat

Judge Shoots Down State Center Deal

The ruling is a huge setback for state government plans to turn its 20 acres of aging office buildings into a modern mixed-use development under a public-private partnership.

The $1.5 billion State Center deal is subject to state procurement laws and needs to be properly bid, Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge Althea M. Handy has ruled.

“The Court finds, and the Defendants admit, that Defendants did not comply with the procedures required in the code, therefore, the Master Development Agreement, the First Amendment to the Master Development Agreement, and the Ground Leases are void,” Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge Althea M. Handy wrote in a decision released Jan. 17.

The ruling is a huge setback for state government plans to turn its 20 acres of aging office buildings into a modern mixed-use development under a public-private partnership. It’s a huge victory for downtown office-building owners who sued to stop the project, arguing that the project would drain renters from their buildings and would do so with their tax money—which was being handed out in violation of state contracting rules.

“On behalf of the many downtown businesses, both small and large, that raised questions about this project and how it was awarded, we are pleased,” said Alan Rifkin of Rifkin, Livingston, Levitan, and Silver, who represented the plaintiffs. “The court’s ruling reconfirms the significance of following the competitive bidding laws that have served the people of this state for well for so many years.”

We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus