CP on Facebook


CP on Twitter
Print Email

Mobtown Beat

Fire Department Dispatcher Sues for Discrimination

Arthur Franklin Kirk III is asking for $3 million in damages, back pay

A Baltimore City Fire Department dispatcher, the 41-year-old son of a late Baltimore politician, has sued the department for discrimination and retaliation, according to a complaint filed in U.S. District Court on Aug. 8.

The dispatcher, Arthur Franklin Kirk III, is asking for $3 million in damages, back pay, in addition to being returned to his job, according to the lawsuit—though Kirk III told City Paper he still works for the department. That was the only thing Kirk III said about the case, citing his concerns about the department’s policy on employees talking to the media.

Kirk III’s mother was state Del. Ruth Kirk (D-Baltimore City), who was 81 when she passed away last year. She and her husband, Arthur Kirk Jr., posted two properties in West Baltimore in 1994 to secure their son’s appearance on drug-dealing charges brought by a city grand jury. Kirk III pleaded guilty in 1995 and was given an eight-year suspended sentence, with four years of probation, according to online court records.

Open Baltimore, the city’s government-data clearinghouse, shows that Kirk III was hired by BCFD in Oct. 2001—about two years after his probation ended on the drug-dealing conviction—and as of May 2011, his gross pay was $59,465.76, bolstered with $14,479.76 in surplus pay. As of June 2012, his gross pay was $60,196.92, including a surplus of $12,720.92.

Neal Janey, who is representing Kirk III in the BCFD lawsuit, characterized the complaint as “pretty straightforward,” saying it raises issues about “how he’s been treated with respect to assignments, discipline, and retaliation” by the department since he filed charges of racial discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The lawsuit, which is spare on details and dates, says the EEOC issued a “right to sue” letter after its investigation, since it declined to initiate its own enforcement action over the matter.

  • General Assembly 2014 Winners and Losers Taking stock of the session that just ended | 4/16/2014
  • Show us your licensing Following controversial case, new policy requires liquor board to make more decisions public | 4/16/2014
  • Who Do We Love? Maryland gives tax breaks to lots of businesses, not just Kevin Spacey’s | 4/9/2014
  • Sale On Baltimore is about to sell off its public housing. Someone is going to make money—and that’s the plan. | 4/2/2014
  • Crews In For a Bruisin’? Local film crew vets question their future as House of Cards and Annapolis battle over tax credits | 4/2/2014
We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus