CP on Facebook


CP on Twitter
Print Email

Mobtown Beat

City Council Approves Neutered Audit Bill

Watered-down bill calls for audits of 13 city agencies once every four years.

After attempting to pass a bill requiring annual audits of all city agencies, the City Council has weakened the effort multiple times and, on Monday night, finally passed, by a 14-to-1 margin (Council President Bernard C. “Jack” Young was the only “no”), a watered-down bill that calls for audits of 13 major city agencies on a once-every-four-years schedule, beginning in 2014.

Two key citizen backers of the effort to require scheduled audits of city agencies say the current bill, which now becomes a ballot measure to amend the city charter, is too weak and should be voted down.

“If this issue goes to the ballot, as drafted, it will be a referendum on every elected official in city hall. The discussion and debate around the issue will be sufficient to attract the interest, deservedly so, of the Republican Party,” former Recreation and Parks Director Chris Delaporte wrote in an e-mail to City Councilman Carl Stokes (D-12th District), the bill’s chief sponsor, on Aug. 8. “Right now, with what is coming up for a vote, you will be asking our citizens to keep us in last place among these 26 largest cities in the nation when it comes to auditing its government.”

Mary Ernish, a Westside resident whose research into other cities’ audit processes has helped shape the debate about the bill, also says the watered-down version passed by a split council at its last meeting is too weak.

Although Comptroller Joan Pratt has said her office needs more resources to do more audits, with a budget of $3.9 million and 37 authorized positions, Baltimore’s audit division appears better staffed than most cities of comparable size.

Stokes soldiers on. “I don’t think we ought to derail this whole thing at this point, because we might not see audits for the rest of this decade,” he said just days before the final vote.

  • General Assembly 2014 Winners and Losers Taking stock of the session that just ended | 4/16/2014
  • Show us your licensing Following controversial case, new policy requires liquor board to make more decisions public | 4/16/2014
  • Who Do We Love? Maryland gives tax breaks to lots of businesses, not just Kevin Spacey’s | 4/9/2014
  • Sale On Baltimore is about to sell off its public housing. Someone is going to make money—and that’s the plan. | 4/2/2014
  • Crews In For a Bruisin’? Local film crew vets question their future as House of Cards and Annapolis battle over tax credits | 4/2/2014
We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus