Trending
Calendar
 
CP on Facebook

 

CP on Twitter
Print Email

Film

Melancholia

It’s the end of the world as we know it, and Kirsten Dunst feels like crap

Photo: , License: N/A, Created: 2010:08:02 21:26:06

That’s not a bouquet . . . : (from Left) Alexander Skarsgàrd, Kirsten Dunst, and Charlotte Gainsbourg watch the skies.


Melancholia

Directed by Lars von Trier

Opens Nov. 25 at the Charles Theatre

The very first thing Lars Von Trier does in his new film is destroy the world. This turns out to be a smart move. Being shown that the end is near in dreamlike snatches, even if you don’t really believe he’ll go through with it in the final reel, makes some of the dodgier patches of Melancholia easier to get through. That’s not to say the film itself is dodgy—as is typical of Trier’s mature work, it’s masterful, visually sumptuous, surprising, and provocative. But as has been typical of Trier’s work all along, it boasts its share of distracting idiosyncrasies. There are moments in Melancholia that are as transfixing as anything else you’ll see onscreen this year, though ultimately those parts slightly outweigh the whole.

The dreamlike/nightmarish opening invokes his last film, 2009’s polarizing Antichrist, but immediately after the title card Trier cracks a visual joke: a gaudy white stretch limo trying to navigate a winding little drive. Justine (Kirsten Dunst) and Michael (Alexander Skarsgård) are late for their wedding reception at the opulent country estate of Justine’s sister Claire (Antichrist’s Charlotte Gainsbourg) and her rich-prick husband John (Kiefer Sutherland). Jostling among the guests with a hand-held camera, just like the old Dogme days, Trier captures the typical rites of a big family wedding. Of course, in Justine and Claire’s family, dad (John Hurt) is a grizzled eccentric and mom (Charlotte Rampling) a harridan cynic whose wedding toast features her spitting, “Enjoy it while it lasts.” And then there’s some ridiculous business about Justine’s self-satisfied boss (Stellan Skarsgård) trailing her around the party and hounding her for a tag line for an ad campaign.

With Trier’s lens right there, in the formal-wear scrum, he can best capture Dunst’s extraordinary performance as her mood droops and her behavior disintegrates. Justine, it seems, suffers from depression, and you can watch its dull, hollow pall creep slowly over Dunst’s features, transforming them by millimeters. Even the way she hesitantly nips a morsel of wedding cake off a fork proffered by puppyish manboy Michael telegraphs her mounting despair. By night’s end, not only is her marriage scuttled, but she’s noticed that a particular star in the sky isn’t there anymore.

That’s because it’s been eclipsed by Melancholia, the name Trier’s script gives to a rogue planet zooming toward Earth. If that sounds like an overblown metaphor, it doesn’t play that way, in part because the movie pivots 180 degrees at the halfway point to focus on pulled-together, supportive Claire. Months later she brings the all-but-incapacitated Justine back to the estate to nurse her with meatloaf (not a joke) and the beneficial presence of her son Leo (Cameron Spurr). As Melancholia hurtles closer, John reassures Claire that it will hurtle right by, but the horses in the stables stay spooked. Before long Justine seems to improve, achieving a certain calm, and Claire is the one barely keeping it together.

Melancholia divides into two stories about two sisters shot in two different styles; the shaky-cam footage of Justine’s reception/breakdown emphasizes the warm glow of candles, incandescent bulbs, and a social gathering while Justine’s recovery in Claire’s home is more stately and tinted by cool Nordic half-light reminiscent of (ahem) Andrei Tarkovsky’s The Sacrifice. In the end, Trier has made a film about the fragile constructs we build for ourselves to ward off our fate in the implacable gears of the universe, but the first half’s extended detour through upper-class kookistan seems more than a little out of the way to get where he’s going, leaving each set of halves feeling somewhat disconnected.

Yet he manages some extraordinary filmmaking here. The reception sequence, a few eye-rolling wobbles aside, can stand up alongside the great weddings of cinema storytelling. And once his story starts to embrace its underlying sci-fi basis, Trier surprises and delights over and over again. He creates suspense from a child’s toy and evokes looming doom with everything from Melancholia itself, never visibly moving but always threatening, to insects deserting the very soil like the proverbial rats fleeing a sinking ship. If nothing else, Melancholia is worth seeing for another subtly brave performance from Gainsbourg and a revelatory turn from Dunst that relentlessly undercuts any sense of unreality or far-fetchedness, whether it’s death by planetary collision or a creative director working on her wedding night. Melancholia may be CGI, the golf-course-ringed setting may be a rented location, Sutherland may be a moonlighting TV actor, but in almost every moment Justine is real.

We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus